Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DJ	-3,849.9	-3,849.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DK	-7,510.2	-7,510.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DM	-9,848.7	-9,848.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DO	-9,004.4	-9,004.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DZ	-4,835	-4,835	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EC	-11,525	-11,525	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EE	-7,159.4	-7,159.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	EG	-4,270.3	-4,270.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ER	-5,434.1	-5,434.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES	-8,121.2	-8,121.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ES-CA	-6,995.8	-6,995.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ET	-6,023.3	-6,023.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FI	-7,399.6	-7,399.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FJ	-8,779.1	-8,779.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FK	-7,761.2	-7,761.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FO	-10,774	-10,774	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	FR	-10,634	-10,634	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GA	-9,858.2	-9,858.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GB	-11,185	-11,185	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GD	-9,854.5	-9,854.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GE	-10,547	-10,547	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GF	-8,792	-8,792	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GG	-10,058	-10,058	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GH	-6,951	-6,951	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GI	-7,324.9	-7,324.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GL	-2,816.4	-2,816.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GM	-3,803.1	-3,803.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GN	-9,774.7	-9,774.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GP	-8,103.6	-8,103.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GQ	-9,849.9	-9,849.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GR	-9,319	-9,319	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GT	-9,623.9	-9,623.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GW	-8,743.1	-8,743.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	GY	-9,857.1	-9,857.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HN	-11,605	-11,605	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HR	-11,675	-11,675	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HT	-10,038	-10,038	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	HU	-6,310.3	-6,310.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ID	-9,842.9	-9,842.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IE	-12,449	-12,449	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IL	-4,851.4	-4,851.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IM	-11,247	-11,247	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IN	-7,230.2	-7,230.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IQ	-1,823.7	-1,823.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IR	-5,238.5	-5,238.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IS	-10,490	-10,490	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	IT	-10,026	-10,026	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JE	-10,386	-10,386	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JM	-9,846.5	-9,846.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JO	-4,275.2	-4,275.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole