Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	-11,774	-11,774	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	-2,633.9	-2,633.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	-8,095.7	-8,095.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	-8,618.9	-8,618.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	-12,254	-12,254	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	-4,087	-4,087	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	-11,268	-11,268	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	-12,108	-12,108	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	-4,033.4	-4,033.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	-4,867.6	-4,867.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	-2,167.3	-2,167.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	-11,877	-11,877	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	-10,173	-10,173	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	-12,084	-12,084	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	-12,436	-12,436	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	-9,856.5	-9,856.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	-8,791.5	-8,791.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	-5,411	-5,411	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	-9,566.7	-9,566.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	-11,350	-11,350	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	-7,300.4	-7,300.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	-4,509	-4,509	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	-6,040.3	-6,040.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	-7,965.9	-7,965.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	-12,436	-12,436	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	-7,325.7	-7,325.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	-6,236.8	-6,236.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	-9,531.8	-9,531.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	-5,303.5	-5,303.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	-11,839	-11,839	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	-3,103.3	-3,103.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	-9,855.7	-9,855.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	-4,756.2	-4,756.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	-8,467.2	-8,467.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	-10,361	-10,361	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	-5,738.9	-5,738.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	-7,078.6	-7,078.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	-9,842.1	-9,842.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	-8,550	-8,550	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	-5,646	-5,646	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	-12,311	-12,311	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	-4,894.6	-4,894.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	-9,431.8	-9,431.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	-9,858.2	-9,858.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	-7,416.8	-7,416.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	-8,878.5	-8,878.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	-10,962	-10,962	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	-12,466	-12,466	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	-4,026.5	-4,026.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From traffic area, road network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	-9,846.2	-9,846.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole