Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	JP	-802.28	-802.28	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KE	-1.1985	-1.1985	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KG	-1,063.4	-1,063.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KH	-948.91	-948.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KM	-1,963.8	-1,963.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KN	-829.32	-829.32	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KP	-957.23	-957.23	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KR	-853.92	-853.92	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KW	318.41	318.41	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KY	-536.94	-536.94	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	KZ	-81.347	-81.347	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LA	-1,787.8	-1,787.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LB	-651.85	-651.85	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LC	-1,463.4	-1,463.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LI	-1,931.6	-1,931.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LK	-1,239.4	-1,239.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LR	-1,479.7	-1,479.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LS	-51.674	-51.674	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LT	-633.97	-633.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LU	-728.75	-728.75	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LV	-606.85	-606.85	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	LY	-268.97	-268.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MA	-422.3	-422.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MD	-494.38	-494.38	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ME	-1,084.1	-1,084.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MF	-572.88	-572.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MG	-744.58	-744.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MK	-818.14	-818.14	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ML	-177.71	-177.71	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MM	-1,658.9	-1,658.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MN	-263.94	-263.94	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MQ	-1,528.1	-1,528.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MR	-168.68	-168.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MS	-1,236.3	-1,236.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MT	-667.32	-667.32	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MW	-614.79	-614.79	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MX	-564.71	-564.71	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MY	-2,257.8	-2,257.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	MZ	-695.03	-695.03	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NA	-361.23	-361.23	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NC	-1,675.6	-1,675.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NE	-182.39	-182.39	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NG	-672.11	-672.11	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NI	-1,238.6	-1,238.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NL	-600.32	-600.32	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NO	-250.21	-250.21	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NP	-1,423.8	-1,423.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	NZ	-2,022.7	-2,022.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	OM	-40.975	-40.975	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PA	-1,935.1	-1,935.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole