Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PE	-11,786	-11,786	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PG	-10,596	-10,596	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PH	-11,073	-11,073	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PK	-5,349.7	-5,349.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PL	-5,091.4	-5,091.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PM	-3,789.8	-3,789.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PR	-9,263.7	-9,263.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PS	-3,038.3	-3,038.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PT	-9,080.7	-9,080.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PY	-4,494	-4,494	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	QA	-1,046.8	-1,046.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RO	-4,777.3	-4,777.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RS	-8,752.5	-8,752.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RU	-2,667.7	-2,667.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RW	-5,724.4	-5,724.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SA	-4,488	-4,488	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SB	-12,278	-12,278	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SD	-5,364.7	-5,364.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SE	-3,654.7	-3,654.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SG	-7,307.1	-7,307.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SI	-10,069	-10,069	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SK	-9,327	-9,327	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SL	-10,124	-10,124	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SM	-5,349.7	-5,349.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SN	-3,648	-3,648	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SO	-1,946.7	-1,946.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SR	-8,159.7	-8,159.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SS	-4,114.6	-4,114.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ST	-10,941	-10,941	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SV	-10,175	-10,175	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SX	-5,305.9	-5,305.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SY	-1,998.9	-1,998.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SZ	-6,312	-6,312	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TC	-4,541.8	-4,541.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TD	-5,913	-5,913	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TG	-6,203.7	-6,203.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TH	-8,876.6	-8,876.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TJ	-4,821.3	-4,821.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TL	-9,327.1	-9,327.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TM	-1,358.4	-1,358.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TN	-5,747.3	-5,747.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TR	-3,026.8	-3,026.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TT	-6,914.4	-6,914.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TZ	-4,390.3	-4,390.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UA	-3,411.5	-3,411.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UG	-5,777.9	-5,777.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	US	-6,917.5	-6,917.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UY	-4,874.1	-4,874.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UZ	-2,006.4	-2,006.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From mineral extraction site Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VA	-8,341.4	-8,341.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole