Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PE	-1,508.1	-1,508.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PG	-2,059	-2,059	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PH	-2,100.1	-2,100.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PK	-294.63	-294.63	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PL	-627.28	-627.28	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PM	-315.42	-315.42	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PR	-1,408.3	-1,408.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PS	-242.68	-242.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PT	-868.61	-868.61	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	PY	-593.56	-593.56	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	QA	302.86	302.86	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RO	-567.82	-567.82	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RS	-882.67	-882.67	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RU	-190.03	-190.03	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	RW	-346.3	-346.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SA	-242.39	-242.39	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SB	-2,500.4	-2,500.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SD	-239.44	-239.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SE	-305.46	-305.46	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SG	-1,194	-1,194	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SI	-1,099.9	-1,099.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SK	-959.49	-959.49	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SL	-1,574.9	-1,574.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SM	-657.14	-657.14	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SN	-303.92	-303.92	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SO	15.46	15.46	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SR	-1,153.9	-1,153.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SS	-508.93	-508.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ST	-2,185.7	-2,185.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SV	-1,713.6	-1,713.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SX	-572.88	-572.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SY	-56.5	-56.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	SZ	-678.9	-678.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TC	-673.05	-673.05	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TD	-401.49	-401.49	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TG	-798.13	-798.13	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TH	-1,163.5	-1,163.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TJ	-584.07	-584.07	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TL	-1,460.3	-1,460.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TM	-45.073	-45.073	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TN	-487.98	-487.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TR	-133.92	-133.92	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TT	-1,110	-1,110	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	TZ	-435.64	-435.64	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UA	-344.17	-344.17	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UG	-722.57	-722.57	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	US	-591.51	-591.51	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UY	-649.41	-649.41	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	UZ	-454.44	-454.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VA	-752.9	-752.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole