Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VC	10,688	10,688	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VE	8,934.2	8,934.2	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VG	5,812.5	5,812.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VI	5,814.7	5,814.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VN	10,240	10,240	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	VU	8,773.8	8,773.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	YE	4,587.4	4,587.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	YT	6,806.1	6,806.1	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ZA	6,083.7	6,083.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ZM	5,935.5	5,935.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
To traffic area, rail network Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	ZW	8,282.9	8,282.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole