Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 0 Outside tolerance 144 Within tolerance 171 Identical 21,847

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Acidification	—	3.02	3.02	1.0000× identical	agreed
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Ecotoxicity, freshwater	—	116.25	116.25	1.0000× identical	agreed
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Ecotoxicity, freshwater_inorganics	—	116.25	116.25	1.0000× identical	agreed
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Eutrophication marine	—	0.092	0.092	1.0000× identical	agreed
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Eutrophication, terrestrial	—	13.47	13.47	1.0000× identical	agreed
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, non-cancer	—	1.5269e-09	1.5269e-09	1.0000× identical	agreed
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, non-cancer_inorganics	—	1.5269e-09	1.5269e-09	1.0000× identical	agreed
Ammonia Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	EF-particulate Matter	—	2.1000e-05	2.1000e-05	1.0000× identical	agreed