Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
Sulfur hexafluoride Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Climate change EF 3.1	—	25,200	25,200	24,300	1.04× 2x European Commission — JRC higher	ruled
Sulfur hexafluoride Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Climate change-Fossil EF 3.1	—	25,200	25,200	24,300	1.04× 2x European Commission — JRC higher	ruled
Sulfur hexafluoride Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Ecotoxicity, freshwater EF 3.1	—	0.082316	0.082316	0.082316	1.0000× identical	agreed
Sulfur hexafluoride Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Ecotoxicity, freshwater_inorganics EF 3.1	—	0.082316	0.082316	0.082316	1.0000× identical	agreed
Sulfur hexafluoride Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, non-cancer EF 3.1	—	9.1615e-12	9.1615e-12	9.1615e-12	1.0000× identical	agreed
Sulfur hexafluoride Environmental → Air → Medium stack, <150 meters → Rural (<1000 people/square mile)	Human toxicity, non-cancer_inorganics EF 3.1	—	9.1615e-12	9.1615e-12	9.1615e-12	1.0000× identical	agreed