Where the implementations differ

Every row more than one implementation states, sorted by ratio, widest first. A difference is not an error. Competent teams rendering one method against different flow lists will differ, and most of these are modelling choices; the widest are worth a conversation, not a correction.

Published says what this list did about the row: `agreed` where they stated one number, `sole` where only one did, and nothing at all where the disagreement went to a queue instead.

Band All Incomparable 12 Outside tolerance 244 Within tolerance 450 Identical 36,242

Flow	Category	Place	European Commission — JRC	GreenDelta	ecoinvent Centre	Apart	Published
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	—	-482.18	-482.18	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AD	-1,326.9	-1,326.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AE	327.29	327.29	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AF	-312.86	-312.86	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AG	-603.08	-603.08	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AI	-510.38	-510.38	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AL	-786.5	-786.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AM	-91.923	-91.923	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AO	-747.52	-747.52	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AR	-534.83	-534.83	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AT	-1,127	-1,127	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AU	-189.17	-189.17	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AW	167.99	167.99	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	AZ	-456.57	-456.57	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BA	-1,010.4	-1,010.4	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BB	-661.14	-661.14	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BD	-946.22	-946.22	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BE	-894.98	-894.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BF	-386.26	-386.26	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BG	-687.38	-687.38	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BH	305.98	305.98	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BI	-341.22	-341.22	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BJ	-669.59	-669.59	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BL	-611.81	-611.81	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BN	-1,644.3	-1,644.3	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BO	-762.64	-762.64	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ	177.63	177.63	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BQ-SE	-865.62	-865.62	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BR	-979.93	-979.93	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BS	-552.66	-552.66	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BT	-1,023	-1,023	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BW	-168.44	-168.44	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BY	-617.91	-617.91	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	BZ	-1,040.8	-1,040.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CA	-267.17	-267.17	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CD	-919.76	-919.76	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CF	-820.88	-820.88	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CG	-1,041	-1,041	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CH	-1,182.7	-1,182.7	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CI	-894.99	-894.99	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CL	-657.5	-657.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CM	-1,028.9	-1,028.9	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CN	-682.58	-682.58	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CO	-1,741.6	-1,741.6	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CR	-2,051.5	-2,051.5	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CU	-673.97	-673.97	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CW	23.393	23.393	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CY	-659.74	-659.74	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	CZ	-863.8	-863.8	—	1.0000× identical	sole
From agriculture Land Use → Transformation	Land use EF 3.1	DE	-671.68	-671.68	—	1.0000× identical	sole